PDF icon Download PDF
J Wrist Surg 2024; 13(06): 559-571
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1774331
Survey or Meta-Analysis

Volar Locking Plate versus Closed Reduction and Immobilization for Distal Radius Fracture in the Elderly: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Niyaz Latypov 
1   Federal State Budgetary Institution of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov, Moscow, Russian Federation
2   “Private clinic Almaty”, Almaty, Kazakhstan
3   City clinical hospital №4, Almaty, Kazakhstan
,
Igor Golubev 
1   Federal State Budgetary Institution of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov, Moscow, Russian Federation
4   European Medical Center, European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopedics (ECSTO), Moscow, Russia
,
Alyona Borisova 
5   RUDN University, Medical Institute, Department of Normal Physiology, Moscow, Russia
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints
Preview

Abstract

Introduction A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted to compare surgical treatment using open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with volar locking plates (VLP) to conservative treatment with closed reduction and immobilization in elderly patients aged ≥60 years with acute displaced distal radius fractures.

Methods A search of the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases was conducted. Clinical and radiographic measures at 12 months were compared between groups by pooling the mean difference. The complication rates were compared by pooling relative risk ratios. Pooled mean differences of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) results were compared with the published minimal clinically important difference (MCID) to evaluate the clinical relevance of the results.

Results The initial search yielded 766 records, from which 6 articles were selected for the final analysis. The results of the DASH questionnaire at 12 months of follow-up were significantly lower in the surgical treatment group with a mean difference (MD) of –3.61 points (95% confidence interval [CI]: –6.48 to –0.73). No statistically significant difference was found in the PRWE questionnaire (MD = –3.14 points [95% CI: –7.32 to 1.04]). Radiological results were significantly better in the surgical treatment group and no significant difference in the overall complication rate between the groups was detected. Found MD for DASH and PRWE did not reach the published MCIDs.

Conclusion This study suggests that for elderly patients aged ≥60 years with acute displaced distal radius fractures, surgical treatment using ORIF with VLP does not provide clinically relevant benefits compared with conservative treatment with closed reduction and immobilization at the 12-month follow-up, despite demonstrating better radiological results.

Keywords

distal radius fracture - elderly - volar locking plate - cast - immobilization

A Statement of the Location

This work was performed in the Federal State Budgetary Institution of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov.




Publication History

Received: 05 June 2023

Accepted: 10 August 2023

Article published online:
07 November 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA